Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Path Mapper help needed:Split Surface with 14 surfaces and 70 curves

Here's a screenshot with a description of what i would like to achieve! 

Views: 1184

Replies to This Discussion

Like this?

 

Chris

Chris, that's great! thank you very much... that is definitely an option. 

 

However, I need something that i don't have to manually explode at the end, as it destroys the parametric dependencies if I, for example, increase the number of surfaces. In which case I may as well bake everything a step earlier and subtract in Rhino (which i would like to avoid and bake right at the end). 

 

this is what I get....uncut surfaces and some random rectangular surfaces.... Im guessing both lists should have the same tree structure?

 

this may not help with the data mapping issue, but you could simply feed both your rectangular regions and the outlines of the planar surfaces as a flat list into a planar srf component - it is smart enough to cut out the interior curves as voids.

True.... however, the rectangles that i want to cut out of the surfaces overlap over the surfaces' edge (i did this because i thought a bit of overlap off the edge would ensure a subtraction). The planar surf in that case would leave the edge?

 

@Chris @Andrew maybe I should have made it clearer.... I am trying to cut slots in some surfaces (ribs) for later fabrication through laser cutting. It's a classic problem, and I've seen some other solutions, but I wanted to get my definition built from the ground up to try and understand all these processes. Here is 

another screenshot to make it clearer. 

The 14 surfaces are the vertical lamellae. The 70 curves are the little vertical triangles arranged on circular sections. There are 14 rectangles for each of the 5 circular sections. 

 

So how do sort, remap the lists of surfaces and curves, in order that when i plug them into a subtraction/difference/intersection/boolean component, i get the result:14 surfaces each with 5 cuts down their vertical edge?

 

Chris
Attachments:

Excellent chris! I received your reply just now as I myself reached a solution! Thank you very much for your help! 

 

I noticed on your solution, at the end, the planar surfaces still need culling, inthe last branch you'll notice there are another 10 surfaces (they are all without notches, and at the same coordinates. So I added the last step to cull the remaining indices. However, I think this breaks the flow of the algorhythm and must be changed manually to match? Perhaps it's to do with a data matching problem upstream (shortest list vs. longest?). 

 

Further down there's screen shots of my solution and results. Now it is fully integrated into the definition, and I can change all parameters without it breaking down! 

 

my solution:

 

 

 

Good catch Guido.  I culled them with the Path Mapper. Nice job with your definition.

 

Chris

Thanks chris! it has definitely helped me understand the path mapper a lot more... but i still don't quite get it fully! :) 

for example, how is your pathmapper clipping the data when the source and target masks are identical? what's going on there?

 

It's because the branch with the multiple surfaces has one more index position than all the others, ie. it ends in H instead of G.  Since it doesn't match it's dropped from the list.

 

Chris

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service