algorithmic modeling for Rhino
A minor update to the remeshing component (read about the earlier release here)
This adds the option to also scale the triangle size by distance from the boundaries:
download this new version here:
(replaces the previous version, no need to change any of the other files)
The 2 new inputs are BoundaryScale and BoundaryDistance
If BoundaryScale is set to 1 (the default) then it has no effect and everything else works as before.
If it is set to (for example) 0.2, then the mesh edges along the boundaries will have a target length of 0.2 multiplied by the Length input value.
The BoundaryDistance input controls the size of the transition zone from this reduced boundary edge length to the standard edge length. For example, in the image below, on the left the BoundaryDistance is 4.0, and on the right 10.0
and here's an example of a circle packing with boundary gradient (generated by using the CPMesh component from Kangaroo on the output of MeshMachine):
Comment
Further question: Is it possible to somehow set a minimum edge length when using mesh machine?
When I approximate a wavy freeform surface with triangles, I need the CurvatureAdaptivity to work but not go lower than a particular minimum edge length. Even if this means a loss of curvature information. I am unsure how to incorporate this into my definition.
Duncan - ah yes, forgot to mention - I included a legacy component so that previous definitions will still open, but when dragging a new meshmachine component from the toolbar it will always be the new one
Fixed it. I didn't realise both the old and new component could co-exist. When I load the old example files, it's showing the old MeshMachine. But when I select a new one from the toolbar, it's the new one.
Thanks for the swift response. I had restarted Rhino, yea.
Searched for *.gha mesh using Win7 search and deleted the instance I indeed found in users/downloads. It's still loading the old component in GH though. I double-checked the GHA in Libraries folder, but it's the 30kb one so should be correct?
Any other ideas?
Looking so exciting. I've replaced the new GHA and saw it's a few KB larger. Yet in GH it's not showing the two new inputs you mentioned, and as I see them in NikFromNYC's screenshot.
Any idea what could be wrong?
Beautiful idea running CP Mesh as a second stage.
this is great daniel thanks! i was trying to do this via script waiting for this feature in mesh machine, what i have done was to use divided points on the boundary courve and then using them as attractors.. but the result was not good as your, obviously, you genius!
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by
You need to be a member of Grasshopper to add comments!