algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Hi!This is very interesting, but I have some questions about the applicability / limitations of your software. What it can and what it can not do. I am an architect, used to formfinding but am not…Continue
Started by Ludvig Haav. Last reply by Tomas Green Nov 13.
Hi all,I'm currently working on calculating reverberation time using Pachyderm Acoustics.I have a reverberation chamber close to me, and I have an environment where I can check the actual…Continue
Started by FUYU. Last reply by FUYU Jun 25.
Hi, I loaded Pachyderm into Rino 7 and tried a simple model in a box and it immediately crashed Rhino. I cycled through that a few times with the same result. I off loaded Rhino 7 and re-loaded…Continue
Started by Kenneth W. Martin. Last reply by Arthur van der Harten May 28.
Hi Arthur, First of all, thanks for your previous answers,I was wondering if there was a way to calculate the Mapping Method and see the result directly in Grasshopper? I thought that there was maybe…Continue
Started by Sandrine Heroux. Last reply by Avraham Cohen May 27.
Comment
Hi Catherine,
You change it in the usual way. It's just a list of 8 numbers. The default is 120 dB at each of the 8 octave bands, 63 Hz. through 8kHz.
You can either right-click it and mouse down to 'Set Multiple Numbers'. You can also use a number module, and set 8 numbers in it, and then connect it to the 'P' input.
Hope this helps.
Arthur
Hi All,
I have been trying to add the Pachyderm Acoustics plugin for both Rhino 6 SR10 and Rhino 7 SR19. For both programs I get the loading error when trying to add the plugin, and I don't know why or what I can do to fix it.
If anyone has any hints on how to fix it, it would be of great help to me.
Thanks in advance :)
Encarni
Hi Arthur,
How can I set the different materials that i'm working with in my simmulation? For example, I want to separate a space with dividing panels wich have different geometries and materials (wood, glass, metal, plastic) and want to see how the sound behaves in each case. Is it possible to do that?
Thank you in advance.
Hi Arthur, it's me again... sorry haha!
I was having a problem that every time I would try to convolve some IR given by a simulation I would notice a very distinct separation almost like a pre-delay that I thought didn't make sense for the space I've simulated.
So I checked the IR .wav file and found this:
This big gap at the beginning is normal? Why so? When I convolve the IR without this gap the auralization sounds much more credible.
Thank you!
Hi Arthur,
After running the simulation, I'm trying to analyze what the results imply. Is there a way where you can get the data of rays that were taken into account for calculation? The simulation was done with trace specified number of rays. If it's possible in Rhino instead of grasshopper, it would still be a great help to know. Thanks:)
Kyujin
Thank you very much for the super fast reply, Arthur!!
I really appreciate not just the incredible software that you offer completely for free but also your dedication to the education surrounding it and acoustics in general.
Coming from an education in Architecture at a school that doesn't offer extensive education in acoustics people like you make the process of understanding these complicated concepts way easier and enjoyable
Cheers,
Daniel
Hi Daniel,
I haven't heard from you in a while. Welcome back!
Some time ago, I added Echo Kriterion, which was difficult because I don't speak German. Happily, my friends at Politecnico di Torino worked through their network to get a colleague to translate it for me, and that translation is what Pachyderm's implementation is based on.
Yes - Echo Kriterion is based on the paper by Dietsch and Kraak. They made a few assumptions about echoes, and came up with a means for processing the impulse response so that you can get an idea of whether sound at any time exceeds a certain threshold that may correlate with perception of echo. It is empirical in nature, which means they tested some examples on a cohort of individuals, and decided on that basis that at some value, 50% of people will hear an echo for speech or music, respectively, and then decided on another value at which 10% of people would hear an echo. True or false answers the question "Will XX% of people hear an echo if speech/music is heard at this location?" True = yes. False = no.
Now - how accurate is it? I did not modify the implementation from what was specified in the paper, but I wouldn't trust the results outright. The study had a relatively small sample size (as most papers in acoustics do, usually) and I bet the method could use further review, verification, and perhaps some fine-tuning or improvement.
Here is how I use it - if it says True, there probably is an echo... however, if it says False, that doesn't mean there isn't one.
Arthur
Hi Arthur, hope everything is fine.
I was reading the work from Lovstad about Echo Criteria trying to understand how the concept from Dietsch and Kraak is implemented in Pachyderm.
I have to be honest and say that I don't have the necessary knowledge to fully understand the text yet. So I would love some explanation about the Echo Criterion Parameter of analysis in Pachyderm. How should I interpret it and what it means to the acoustical qualities of the space score "false" or "true" in this criterion?
Thank you in advance, cheers.
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by
You need to be a member of Pachyderm Acoustic to add comments!