Plug-Ins

I ignore if this has been already discussed, if that's the case sorry but I could not find the corresponding discussion.

I was browsing the plug-in section just to see what's new, hoping to find something useful because I have been working mostly with bare GH for some time now. Well I am sorry to say that the plug-in organization leaves a lot to be desired, if you happen to be new to the plugs then you will be greeted by a unsorted amount of groups, where it is very difficult to know what is interesting/useful (for me) and what not. Sometimes the only way to know what a specific plug does is clicking on the provided link and opening the web page of the plug developer. It is a bit frustrating to tell the truth. Plugs are also mixed with discussion groups too.

Would it be difficult to ask every group owner to conform to a standard header that includes in a few lines, if this is a user group or plug-in, in the case of a plug-in a basic category could be stated, followed by a short description. This can't be too hard, right?

I don't want to piss anyone, hope that this doesn't come as an angry rant. I am just trying to address a problem that maybe has jet to be discussed. I know that ning was not intended to be used like we are doing, but a bit communication could go a long way to address simple but frustrating problems like this.

To all the developers that take time to develop, share and maintain plug-ins, thanks a lot! Keep the good work. :)