algorithmic modeling for Rhino
This is a question specifically asking David Rutten, I suppose, since he is the residential C# guru here.
I am interested in overriding more Grasshopper components GUIs.
I have this component here, the Value List:
Instead of no input, I would like if the input were two lists, and the output would remain consistent to what it outputs now.
I guess the only change I want to make to this component is the fact that instead of right-clicking it to edit the value list constants, I would like to have that list dynamically generated based on two list inputs (likely from Excel).
The back-end I understand how to do (joining two lists), however, I'm not quite sure how to override the GUI settings.
David, could you offer me some help on this?
Tags:
This doesn't answer your question specifically but have a look at andrew's Human plug-in where he has a component Dynamic Value list based on GH's
The Value List is actually a parameter, not a component. Most special objects are parameters (Toggles, Buttons, Sliders, Dials, Panels, etc. etc.). Parameters can have a maximum of one input and one output, which is sufficient for most special objects. The exceptions are Legend and Gradient btw., those are actual components.
The problem is that components are difficult to change. There's an awful lot of code involved in keeping the inputs and outputs correctly linked and positioned. It can be done, but it aint easy.
If you provide custom attributes for a GH_Component, you must do the following things:
You may also want to override the RespondToMouseDown or RespondToMouseClick methods if you want to display a popup menu.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Parameters are much easier to work with. They have one input grip, one output grip, they only collect data (plus maybe some post-processes such as grafting, flattening, expressions etc). Components are aggregates of objects. There's the component itself which does all the work and it also maintains a collection of linked input and output parameters which all have to work together and be drawn together.
If you want an object with two inputs, then you have to use a GH_Component. If you're willing to only have a single input and single output, then it becomes a lot easier.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Well creating a standard component is quite easy because all the cumbersome work is done by the base class (GH_Component). If you want to change this default behaviour then you have to start writing a lot of annoying code.
Writing new components is something I tried to make as easy as possible because I thought it was pretty much all that plugin developers would want to do. That has turned out to be a serious underestimate, but for the time being writing your own IGH_Goo, IGH_Params and making GH_Components non-standard is difficult.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
David,
I'm interested in this topic. Are there any examples, and or documentation, available?
I've hooked up a form to a component and am controlling selections through the form but I'd like to find a more elegant solution / GUI.
There are no examples of overriding GH_Component attributes, but in the Grasshopper SDK help you can find an example of overriding IGH_Param attributes. (See Custom Attributes)
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by