Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

The Network Surface component is playing with my nerves :

In my definition, it refuses to produce a surface (Null result, no error warning) with the two sets of input curves.

If I bake the two sets , I am able to make a Network surface with the Rhino tool.

Worse : if I reference the baked curves and use them as inputs for a GH Network Surface component, then this time, it works...

Attached, the original GH file.

Cheers,

Views: 631

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

It's crucial that you follow the sequential order when you inputting the curves into the network curve component.

Attachments:

Hi Hyungsoo,

Thanks for your help.

I do know that curves need to be sorted for NetworkSrf to work.

That is why I used a "Merge" component, thinking that the input order was actually maintained, but I realize with great disappointment that it isn't.

I'm really perplexed by this, having used it so many times.

What is the point in having multiple distinct inputs, if the stuff is jumbled afterwards ?

This has to ba a bad dream...

Attachments:

Hi.

Now it's likely to find the cause. You'd be better off collapsing data tree structure of curves before inputting into "merge".

Attachments:

Phewww ! OK, that makes sense (kind of)

Not sure why the tree structure interferes with the order, but indeed, that was the issue.

The "automatic grafting" paradigm set me a trap here...

Yet another example how data trees can be evil :)

Thanks a lot Hyungsoo.

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service