Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

Hello, could someone tell me why my minimal path definition doesn’t work? I try to redo the one I found on this website http://fr.egg-life.net/article/175617 but my segments doesen't bend like the picture below...

Views: 3654

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

Line springs just too stiff.

So it takes line springs and attracts them to each other by adding points along each line that are mutually attracted to each other.

The Exponents of the attraction should also have some real influence.

-1 or -2 makes them unstable, so I'll add Damping to the line springs too. Nope, raising damping made lines blow up, oddly enough. A real power law instead of inverse power law has real effect though with Exponents set above 0, but it wacks out by 4:

Oh I see, if a line is too long, it can only bend, so it gets pinched into S forms instead of following along the others. I see it clearest in Exponents 3 above, on the left.

Actually I'm wrong, for if I up the Cutoff, I get:

So what's causing all the disorder in the previous cases? What's Cutoff really doing?

Replacing your Boolean toggle switch on Kangaroo with a Button is important since the result depends on the starting movement and must thus be reset each time you change a parameter.

Have fun and perhaps post some results.

Attachments:

Thank's a lot!

I found an other definition that works better!

I try to get a result that looks like the image below

Attachments:

You have an older version of Grasshopper and perhaps Kangaroo too, likely worth updating as you try others' scripts:

So you added a controlled bending resistance instead of just spring stiffness:

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service