algorithmic modeling for Rhino
I am trying to make a sequence of numbers (points) that would escalade linearly until reaching certain value (domain). I have done the sequence in an exponential manner, but I got stuck with this relatively simple task.
Any suggestions?
Summing up, with my exponential definition (rhino image attached) I get my last 5 numbers/points equaly spaced! And I would like the gaps to gradually increase in a linear scaling.
Tags:
Is it supposed to be linear or exponential? Or is it a square-root progression as your image seems to indicate?
Shouldn't the [Bounds] component inherit from the [Square Root] component rather than the unprocessed values in [Series]?
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Tirol, Austria
I thought that a so called square-root progression has an exponential growth, isn't it so?
Indeed, now I realize that I had the [Bounds] component getting data from the [Series] instead of [Square Root].
I still get the same result though, there is clearly something I'm missing. The 4-5 last 'gaps' have the same distance, and that is not what I am looking for. I am looking for an upscaling progression from a minimum value to a maximum value, each step increasing a little more than the previous one. Any comments?
Thanks,
I am getting closer:
I used the [Fibonacci] component to create the sequence, and now each 'gap' has a different value, which is what I need. The problem is that those values are scaling exponentially (if I got my terms correctly) and I am looking for a linear scaling sequence.
Exponential means the variable is in the exponent of the equation, not in the base. I.e.
x2 (which is the same as squaring)
x3 (which is the same as cubing)
x0.5 (which is the same as square root)
Are examples of power functions with x in the base, whereas:
2x
3x
0.5x
Are examples of exponential growth where x is in the exponent.
I can't repeat your problem though, the distances are all different in my file:
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Tirol, Austria
I understand what you are explaning to me, and I appreciate it.
I have an exponential and linear sequences. The linear growth is achieved in this case with a [Series] component, whereas the exponential growth is achieved by the square of a series of numbers (image attached). These concepts are right to me, let me know if I got them wrong.
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by