algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Hi All,
an incremental update is available. THIS WON'T RUN ON RHINO5 UNTIL THE NEXT R5 WIP GOES OUT!!!!
I'll be travelling for the next week or so, stopping at the Automatic Architecture Event in Delft.
If you need to revert to Grasshopper 0.8.0003, download the installer here.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Seattle, WA
Tags:
Hi David
explode curve component:
if two polylines have been joined prior and should than be exploded in it's atomic segments the recursive is not working.I think it is busted,..... I just receive 2 polylines
thanks
I'm teaching a class and several students have been having trouble with curves defaulting to being reparameterized.
If they try and create a sub curve with actual units it doesn't work but instead wants values between 0 and 1 even though the curve has not been set to be reparameterized in any components. The strange thing is that it's only happening to some people and everyone is using the latest build.
The faulty file is attached.
Hi Scott,
this is a clear case of confusion between length and parameters. The number parameter behind the Move component measures the Length of the curve (why didn't you use a Length component for this and get rid of the ambiguity?)
You then create an interval based on this length {x To L-x} and then feed this interval into the SubCurve component, which requires you specify the subcurve in parameters, not length units.
I don't know why this would work for some students and not others, but it shouldn't work for anyone.
If you want to cut the ends of a curve, you'll need to do something like this:
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia
Hi David,
I understand the approach you depicted in your image, but I don't think it addresses the issue that I've seen with some students' files. I can get the Subcurve component to work correctly without going through the Evaluate Length component but when some students constructed that same approach it didn't seem to work.
After your reply I went back to the previously posted definition and found that the line was being passed into a Line Collection component. I tried this with a line from Rhino and confirmed that the Line Collection component causes the curve to be reparameterized.
Why does a grasshopper created line or polyline default to normalized units? I'm guessing that the reason will also explain why the Line Collection component automatically reparameterizes a curve.
(The use of the Number component was for explaining how one data type can be cast into another (curve -> number). What was the reason for taking this functionality out of the math operators?)
Thanks,
Scott
Hi Scott,
the Line parameter is based on the type Rhino.Geometry.Line in our SDK, whereas if you put a Line into the Curve parameter then the underlying type is Rhino.Geometry.LineCurve
Line is a very simple piece of data that implicitly uses the {0;1} domain (just like Circles always use the {0;2×Pi} domain). LineCurve however stores a specific domain value and it allows you to set the domain to whatever you desire. Typically when we (McNeel) add a line to the rhino document, we set the domain to be {0;Length}, because that works best with most curve algorithms. Basically, picking a domain which is roughly analogous with the physical dimensions of an object makes it easier to 'navigate' the parameter space of a curve.
Long story short, Lines as Lines are always {0;1}, Lines as Curves are unpredictable. You should always assume you don't know the domain of a curve unless you specifically reparameterize it yourself or of course unless you measure it.
"What was the reason for taking this functionality out of the math operators?"
Sorry, what functionality?
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia
David,
Thanks for the clarification.
The functionality I was talking about was the ability to plug a curve directly into a number input of a math operator component and it would cast the curve to a number.
Another feature that is no longer available in the math operators is the ability to apply an expression to the input.
Scott
Ah. That is because components like Addition, Multiply etc. now work on a lot of data types. They accept numbers, vectors, points, strings, colours, etc. so it is no longer obvious which conversion should take place when you plug a curve into one of these.
I'll try and get the Expression functionality back into those parameters, but it will take some creative hacking on my part to make it work reliably with all these different data types.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia
Hi David,
Would you add the Graft/Flatten from the context menu to the undo stack, please?
Done. I also forgot to add the new Reverse option to the undo-stack. Three bug fixes in 5 minutes, I think we both deserved a drink. What say you?
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by