Grasshopper 0.8.0003 available for download

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Yoann Mescam (Systemiq) on February 11, 2017 at 12:16pm

if you display the real values, all seems ok. As David said, Panel component rounds the value.

Were you saying you had some 405.xxx not < 950 ? I didnt see any in your example.

Permalink Reply by Andrew Heumann on November 30, 2010 at 10:00pm

Being unreasonably nitpicky here, but just noticed that both "mesh union" and "mesh difference" are labeled "mesh union" in the menu.

Also, is it possible to make the tab scroll a little less sensitive? If my window is small enough that I have the option to scroll through the component categories, I frequently activate the scrolling when I meant to simply change tabs. I would think it would just be a matter of requiring a displacement of an additional pixel or two.

It seems like only yesterday that GH had no undo, and today all I can find to complain about are typos and differences of a pixel... keep up the amazing work!!!

Permalink Reply by Ali Tabatabai on December 2, 2010 at 5:37am

Hi,

Is this a bug, or just me not getting it right?
The components giving me the right (expected) result, but then the cluster made of the same selection dose not... see image.

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on December 6, 2010 at 2:26pm

I tried to remodel your file but couldn't repeat the problem. Could you please post the 3dm and gh files so I can be sure I'm going down the right path?

--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Seattle, WA

Permalink Reply by Ali Tabatabai on December 6, 2010 at 3:06pm

...sure, here you go.

//A

Attachments:

• cluster_issue.zip, 18 KB

Permalink Reply by Ali Tabatabai on December 6, 2010 at 3:10pm

here is the result I'm reproducing... I hope it helps.

//A

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on December 6, 2010 at 3:35pm

It seems to be due to the same bug that causes the output sorting to fail, which is why I couldn't repeat it because it was already fixed :)

However I did find another bug with duplicated cluster outputs.

--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Seattle, WA

Permalink Reply by Luis Fraguada on December 6, 2010 at 4:20pm

Did This get fixed? Seemed to be a cluster issue with trees...it flattened them.

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on December 6, 2010 at 4:32pm

Not sure yet, I'll look into that next.

--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Seattle, WA

Permalink Reply by David Stasiuk on December 9, 2010 at 3:12am

...so look for the cluster sorting fix in 0.8.0004?

Permalink Reply by Mårten Nettelbladt on December 2, 2010 at 2:42pm

Hi David. Any chance of a "toy car" component in GH?
Or perhaps as a cluster? /Mårten

Permalink Reply by Matt Gaydon on December 5, 2010 at 6:06pm

Hi David

A few bugs i seem to have come across in the last few days:

1. The GH Divide Surface component seems to be broken in Rhino V5 as it gives null as outputs for all points around the edge of the surface.
2. If i use an extract an edge crv or an Iso crv from a surface divide it then input this division pts into a Surface closest pt component, using the same surface as pulling object i used to get output distance = 0 though now it seems to output different larger numbers even if i change the Absolute Tolerance and the Mesh Setting in Rhino in both V4 And V5.


Thanks for the Amazing Software

Matt

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• Next ›
• Page