Gradient 0 & 100 %

Hallo community

I am not sure why, but in my definition, gradient is little bit getting out of my range.

I am using several gradient in my definition, and all are working fine, except the last gradient (for the final result).

in the picture they are 2 gray pixel. These should be green like the rest. Anyone know what could be the problem? (The gradient is set only between 0% and 100%)

many thanks in advance!

Attachments:

gradient_0%.JPG, 118 KB
gradient_100%.JPG, 117 KB

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on November 4, 2017 at 2:43pm

Impossible to tell without the definition. From a glance it looks like 1: you dont have anything determining the upper limit of the gradient (L1 input). 2. your entire gradient is gray.

Permalink Reply by nass on November 4, 2017 at 2:54pm

the definition is too big. I just internalise the data to the gradient.

I just need discrete color. in my case i need gray and green.

Attachments:

gradient.gh, 10 KB

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on November 4, 2017 at 3:00pm

What is the criteria that should determine if it is gray or green?

Permalink Reply by nass on November 4, 2017 at 3:04pm

the green is when the values are greater then 250, grey when they are less then 250.

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on November 4, 2017 at 3:10pm

I suspect its just that your data really does not make sense. For instance in the second branch you are giving 20 colors to 12 pixels - So based on longest list rules your last pixel in that list is getting 8 colors. You will have to fix that data for any real help.

Permalink Reply by Hyungsoo Kim on November 4, 2017 at 3:21pm

Or just use "Shortest List" with trim end works for you?

Permalink Reply by nass on November 4, 2017 at 3:28pm

ah, with shortest list, it looks better, but still one pixel ist missing...

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on November 4, 2017 at 3:29pm

It is a list management issue, Something you are not doing correctly. You will have to go through the definition and really look at how you are passing your data along.

Permalink Reply by nass on November 4, 2017 at 3:38pm

ok. I am not sure what is the problem. I will check it tomorrow.

but thx for your replies though!

RSS