algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Hello everyone,
I am seeking your general advice in terms of using Galapagos/Octopus. I do not know whether it is the display issue associated with my computer only, I always start with blank interface when I start running Galapagos/Octopus (below is "room orientation optimization" shared at http://hydrashare.github.io/hydra/viewer?owner=mostaphaRoudsari&...) It may take quite some time to see some results. That's fine for the above simulation. But my real challenge is, when I am going to optimize room dimension with respect to ASE and sDA calculations, either Galapagos or Octopus goes wildly and never come up with a solution. I believe the time-consuming calculation, especially sDA with higher -ab numbers, trigger the lag a lot? Any suggestion/trick to improve it?
Most importantly, based on your experience, for example to optimize window/exterior shades sizes and achieve ASE<10% and sDA>55% (LEED v.4 requirements), Octopus (due to its capacity of multiple objectives) is the only choice? Any other approaches within grasshopper?
The alternative approach in my mind as a GH beginner is as follows. But I am not sure whether it is doable. Again, your comments will be greatly appreciated.
Since all my room/window/shades dimension are controlled by number sliders, I am thinking whether a component from GH will trigger these number sliders (not necessary to be all of them but one by one) automatically. If this is possible, I can do "data recorder" to record outputs from ASE and sDA. Eventually I will have a database of the input parameters and sDA/ASE results.
Does it make sense? Is there a component which can trigger number slider output at certain step?
Many thank!
Cheney
Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Have you tried the KB_Fly?
-A.
What Abraham said and then use DesignExplorer to visualize the results.
You guys are awesome, now I see an alternative approach!
I was just wondering.. What's KB_Fly? I couldn't find info on it.
Should be LB_Fly. Look at group 4 (Extra) in LB.
-A.
Thank you, guys! I am testing LB_Fly now. DesignExplorer is also a very good suggestion. I used it for Designbuiler optimization analysis before. It will be a good tool to select my target combinations. Hopefully the approach could replace Octopus in my calculation.
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by