Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

For the NSAD Adv. Rhino class-

It's good to see some submittals for the F.14 variation popping up on the forum ahead of the deadline.  To keep things a bit more organized, please reply to this discussion with a brief description, an image of the preview geometry in the model space, and attach your definition.  If you started a your own thread, you can delete it after posting here.

Thanks!

Views: 970

Replies to This Discussion

Hey class this is my F.1.4 grasshopper definition. Instead of one curve input I used the Merge component to draw two forms from two curve inputs. 

Attachments:

Hi everyone,

This is my F.1.4 Grasshopper Definition. 

Attachments:

Hey, this is my version of f.1.4 definition. I kept the everything pretty close to the primer and then I played around with the graph mapper.

Attachments:

Hi All

In each variation, the number of curve segments is changed, as well as the multiplication factor and the graph type.

Attachments:

Here's my F.1.4 Definition, I got curious, so tried what Daichi Saito did by adding an extra curve and then merging them.

Attachments:

Hi, this is my F.1.4 Grasshopper definition. I used 3 different curves and merged them, a straight line a curved line, and a circle. Also I would like to know why we reparameterize the curve?

Attachments:

Baharak-

Since you are using a single component that divides the curves into equal lengths, you are asking the component to figure out what that length is simultaneously for multiple curves that have different overall lengths (in your case three curves, for Daichi two).  Reparameterizing the curve sets up new domain for each curve where 0 is the start and 1 is the end, and then computes the lengths of the divisions separately for each curve.  The result is similar behaviors in the cross sections of all the lofted surfaces, regardless of the input curve's length or shape.  

To see the difference, use three open control point curves with different lengths and shapes as the  input curves for your definition, and see the difference as you toggle the reparameterize option on and off.

As a side note, the Merge Data component is not needed in the definitions posted by you and Daichi.  You can just plug the curves directly into the Divide Curve component.

Hi, I used two curves. One vertical and the other in diagonal. I try to intersect each one. For the multiplication I used double the value from one to the other. I was having travel using the graph. 

Attachments:

Nice to see everyone's work. Here's my F.1.4 assignment. I used a closed curve for my version and played with different graph types by right clicking on the graph and choosing "Graph Type".

Attachments:

Hi class,

This is my f.1.4 grasshopper definition. I also added my variation of the definition using multiple curves using the same parameters and adjusting the curve via graph mapper.

Attachments:

HELLO GENTS AND LADS!

HERE IS MY DEFINITIONS I DID FOR F1.4.

THE FIRST ONE IS AS CLOSE TO THE BOOK.

THE SCOND ONE I ADDED TWO CURVES AND USED THE MERGE COMPONENT.

-JUAN CRUZ 

Attachments:

Hi everybody,

I am posting my F.1.4 Grasshopper definitions. There is a short explanation inside the group box. First denition (left) Second definition (middle) and third definition (right) on rhino.

Attachments:

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service