algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Hi Mario!
Thank you for the answer.
I tried to make a both sides extrusion the way you show me but it doesn't seem to work correctly,
Maybe there is a problem in my definition..
Now it works!
I set the F imput of the vector to Graft...
Thank you Mario.
u welcome....
Thanks Michael,
It could be a good idea for large definitions..
Cheers for this, just used it. Had another thought for large definitions.. Could Move resulting extrusion by negative half the original vector. (x*-0.5)
That way just one extrusion moved to appear like an extrusion both directions.
Hallo everybody,
the ways our friend made are useful, but results always 2 geometries.
i am wundering if there are some elegantly solution to extrude a brep in both direction but as ONE geometrie?
I think this may require a two step process...first move your geometry by your vector*-1, then extrude it by your vector*2
dear all,
thx, i think it must be the most of easy way to make!
"i am wundering if there are some elegantly solution to extrude a brep in both direction but as ONE geometrie?"
The given solutions work but then trimming with breps doesn't work anymore - so that is good reason to develop an extrude function with 'two-sided' option as many CAD programs have as well. You keep the original curve as input and generate a single geometry.
...everything we can do to prevent boolean tolerance-related things
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by