Exercise 9.3

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on March 28, 2012 at 11:51pm

have a look here.

1.This image is with the original attractor (repeller) before inverting.

2. Here is the image using remap logic and component, it exactly inverts the original attraction list, which is clear by the image and accurate to the distance logic. 

3. Here is the way as you suggest dividing the slider value by the distance list, This inverts the numbers but not proportional to the input list, It also does not maintain its nice gradient. 

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on March 28, 2012 at 11:31pm

that will give you inverse numbers, but not ones equal to the output of the distance component. That is the goal of remap to invert proportionally exact.

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 28, 2012 at 11:22pm

Here is the definition

Attachments:

• Color Boxes.ghx, 205 KB

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on March 29, 2012 at 12:00am

here is the exact reverse with remap. 

Attachments:

• Task1_inverted.gh, 9 KB

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 29, 2012 at 12:28am

yeah sorry about the duplication of question. Thanks!! could you possibly zoom in on the remap part? Just want to know what wires to what.

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on March 29, 2012 at 12:41am

i attached the file,below the image, download it. 

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 29, 2012 at 2:02am

Oh sweet thanks man. It worked! Is there an alternative way to do it?

Permalink Reply by Hannes Löschke on March 29, 2012 at 2:40am

Remap is just the most elegant way to invert a mapping...

You can do the calculation of what Remap does with native GH math components.

You could use the GraphMapper to apply an inverted function, mapping large input to small output and small input to large out.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page