Exercise 9.3

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Toussaint Jimenez Rojas on March 28, 2012 at 9:12pm

post the definition to see where you need to reverse the way wich the cubes becomes smaller when are closet to the attraction point, i think its too easy to achieve the opositive way 

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 28, 2012 at 11:23pm

Mate. this is the definition below!

Attachments:

• Color Boxes.ghx, 205 KB

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 28, 2012 at 9:46pm

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 28, 2012 at 9:47pm

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 28, 2012 at 9:47pm

Permalink Reply by Toussaint Jimenez Rojas on March 28, 2012 at 10:04pm

post the GH file 

Permalink Reply by Toussaint Jimenez Rojas on March 28, 2012 at 10:11pm

quickly maybe if you apply a math inversion  in the scale commponet can work 

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 28, 2012 at 10:10pm

Ok. Just add an attractor point for it to work.

Attachments:

• Task 1.gh, 7 KB

Permalink Reply by Matt Kraft on March 28, 2012 at 10:22pm

I put 1/F for the scale component and it kind of worked. It made all the boxed tiny though. But they were bigger nearer to the attractor point.

Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on March 28, 2012 at 10:36pm

remap component. look how I do it here. http://formularch.blogspot.com/2012/03/gh-point-attract-repel.html?m=1

Permalink Reply by Toussaint Jimenez Rojas on March 28, 2012 at 11:06pm

just switch your division to get the inverse operation 

distance / number  you got this in the division componet 

number / distance you need to do that 

Permalink Reply by Toussaint Jimenez Rojas on March 28, 2012 at 11:08pm

this avoid to use more slider like in the remap ex that michael use in him case 

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page