algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Tags:
Hi.
In my opinion, your approach is much more like point attractor reponsive facade, not the sun responsive one.
You must consider that the sun is vast and far away from us, so the sunrays are always parallel to your facade.
In this case, your sun position according to your modeling setup is not very useful and only matter is hypothetical azimuth and altitude angle.
I've applied azimuth angles to cell opening intensity, whereas altitude to cell extrusion intensity.
Check attached. You can choose sun and point responsive mode respectively.
Hi Kim, thanks a lot for your reply, its perfect now I can choose between sun and point attractor as well and the facade openings will get affected (azimuth angles to the openings and altitude to extrusion amount) which is so simple and I dont know how it was absent on my mind.
thanks again
In addition to HK stuff get this attached as well (surface and curve are internalized).
Works with any number of attractors (if this make any sense) and either in push or pull mode.
With regard results:
Either you get the fast option ("interactive" so to speak):
Or the long way home (Rhino is pathetically slow when "solids" are involved - but Rhino is not a solid modeller anyway):
Thanks Peter it seems interesting, I have passed through but quickly and I need to understand it well because there is a lot of stages need to get focus on especially you have used C# scripts along with the definition, but anyway thanks so much and appreciate a lot your help.
hello,
I tried the similar file for flat surface instead of curved surface, but could not achieve the previous result. I don't know where is the error. Kindly help its urgent.
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by