algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Cull Patterns Inverted
Not so much a bug as an inconsistency. Currently the cull pattern and cull mesh face components pattern inputs do the inverse culling of each other (true = remove in one but keep in the other). Is it intended for some reason?
Views: 1666
- Attachments:
-
-
Culling.gh, 9 KB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by David Rutten on
-
Is it intended for some reason?
Probably not. There's a lot of inconsistencies in GH1, mostly due to the organic nature in which the project was developed and the absence of any proofing procedures.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Michael Pryor on
-
Ah, thanks for the response David. Just wasn't sure if there was some logic for cull mesh face to be inverted because actually for the example above having it be inverted worked out for me (meaning I didn't have to set it to be inverted). Looking forward to GH2!
-
About
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Translate
Search
Photos
Videos
-
Field Contour
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
-
Voronoi Facade
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
-
Weave Mesh
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
-
Pathway Frames
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson.
Powered by
