Content filter

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on July 8, 2014 at 6:33am

Some people* have objected to certain icons being unfit for human consumption (notably the Duplicate and Random components). The content filter is a way to replace icons that have varying degrees of potential offensiveness with other icons.

--

David Rutten

david@mcneel.com

* Well, just one person actually.

Permalink Reply by Oswald Pfeiffer on July 8, 2014 at 6:49am

Funny ! I never thought that the Schrödinger's cat could be so offensive.
Thanks for the reply !

Permalink Reply by Danny Boyes on July 8, 2014 at 7:02am

I thought it was the original Flatten Icon that was the most controversial. A cat all the same but unlike Schrodinger's it had no chance of survival.

Permalink Reply by Oswald Pfeiffer on July 8, 2014 at 7:10am

Can't be nastier than Rhino Smash command's icon anyway.

Attachments:

• zfzf.png, 1 KB

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on July 8, 2014 at 8:10am

Oddly enough happy bunnies were deemed more offensive than disembowelled cats. I found it strange too.

--

David Rutten

david@mcneel.com

Permalink Reply by nikos tzar on July 8, 2014 at 8:27am

so if it's just for a few icons why are there 5 levels available on this filter?

Permalink Reply by David Rutten on July 8, 2014 at 8:34am

I felt like going overboard with it. No better reason than that I'm afraid...

--

David Rutten

david@mcneel.com

Permalink Reply by Guido R on May 12, 2019 at 5:28pm

I noticed no censoring applies to kangaroo's g-string component picturing a round bum