algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Further testing reveals that when you use a negative number for the index, it causes inaccuracy. Also as you approach the wrapping other inconsistencies are caused.
I don't see it. It's working as it should be. If you look at the appropriate tree, the square, the hexagon and the circle are all in column index=2 (i.e. the third column) and item index=5 (i.e. the sixth item).
The square:
The circle:
The hexagon:
I attached a file that helps you investigate the layout of points within each tree.
Perhaps the behaviour you were expecting happens when you wrap both the paths and the items?
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by