Daniel Hambleton's Discussions (64)

View

Discussions Replied To (39)	Replies	Latest Activity
"I did this with the SPM Vector Components add-on. There is actually a very similar d…" Daniel Hambleton replied Jun 27, 2013 to vector field!!!!	6	Jun 29, 2013 Reply by SRM
"I haven't updated the plugin in some time, but the SPM Vector Components was designe…" Daniel Hambleton replied Apr 23, 2013 to Principal Stress Trajectories	36	Jun 7, 2013 Reply by matteo
"That's pretty cool! What about being able to navigate "vertically" through layers?…" Daniel Hambleton replied Mar 11, 2013 to Tabs and tabs...	22	Mar 14, 2013 Reply by Fred Becquelin
"Hi Nick, If you allow some error between the panels, things get a bit easier...Here…" Daniel Hambleton replied Feb 21, 2013 to Panelizing doubly curved surfaces	20	Feb 26, 2013 Reply by Anton Bakerjian
"I'd be interested in working on this. A while ago, I wrote a basic SPH simulation fo…" Daniel Hambleton replied Nov 3, 2012 to visualizing wind vectors (kangaroo)	15	Jun 15, 2017 Reply by roderick read
"There does seem to be a Python binding: http://code.google.com/p/cgal-bindings/ " Daniel Hambleton replied Jul 4, 2012 to Using the CGAL algorithm library in GH - converting c++ to c#?	5	Dec 23, 2012 Reply by Benjamin Golder
"Check out zonohedra or minkowski sums..." Daniel Hambleton replied Apr 25, 2012 to Is there a solution to this mathematical problem	3	Apr 26, 2012 Reply by Daniel Piker
"Hi Monique, You can do this with the Interpolation components in the SPM Vector Com…" Daniel Hambleton replied Apr 7, 2012 to Nesting Sliders	26	Jul 4, 2019 Reply by Rob Geyer
"This seems like a tricky problem....the easiest thing to do would be to morph the tw…" Daniel Hambleton replied Sep 23, 2011 to magnetic field to avoid overlapping lines	4	Apr 24, 2015 Reply by ｗｅｎｄｙ
"Meshlab is built on http://vcg.sourceforge.net/index.php/Main_Page (VCG Library). I…" Daniel Hambleton replied Jun 22, 2011 to 3D FingerPrint - need to extract ridges and valleys?? Principal Curvatures Estimation	6	Jun 22, 2011 Reply by David Rutten