GH file behave different in R5 compared to R4

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jissi Choi on December 16, 2011 at 12:26am

 

Will you upload your definition..??

 

I checked my definition below and had no difference..

 

I think there might be some other components like Shift or Cull..

 

 

Permalink Reply by Giulio Piacentino on December 16, 2011 at 2:43am

Can you have a look at which Grasshopper version is loaded?

Go to the Grasshopper window and choose Help, About. Is it the same version in Rhino 4 and 5?

Thanks,

- Giulio
________________
giulio@mcneel.com

Permalink Reply by Gui Talarico on December 16, 2011 at 7:48am

Same version of GH, 0.8.0052. I also tried with 00.6 from Nov 2011, same thing.

Permalink Reply by Gui Talarico on December 16, 2011 at 7:49am

And here is part of the definition...

Attachments:

• 3_CirclePanelingChange-temp.gh, 28 KB

Permalink Reply by Jissi Choi on December 18, 2011 at 6:50pm

 

I think there is some difference in making surfaces from closed curves between Rhino 4 and 5..

 

If you use untrim your surfaces, the result surfaces are expanded a little bit in Rhino 5..

 

i.e. Rhino 5 seems to make a trimmed surface from a closed curve..

 

Anyway.. how about using your sub-surfaces directly..

 

It doesn't result any null point..