algorithmic modeling for Rhino
I'd like to put in a request for a Mesh Region tool.
Basically like this:
http://www.cgal.org/Manual/latest/doc_html/cgal_manual/packages.htm...
This can already be accomplished with the workaround of creating a Planar Surface and then using Mesh Brep, but it seems like meshing could potentially be a faster way to visualize and interact with the interior vs exterior areas of closed planar regions. It seems that making Planar Surfaces can be pretty heavy.
As an example of a use case where this is helpful, let's say I use a metaball component on a point grid with charges based on an attractor:
in order to be able to add any sense of solidity or fill to the interior of these shapes, the only way I know is to use Planar Surface, which takes about 5-8 seconds to solve in this case, and therefore seems a little bit heavy. It seems like meshing a region could be faster.
Tags:
I added an auto-conversion from Closed Planar Curves to Meshes:
So you should be able to accomplish this by just plugging the curves into a Mesh parameter come the next build. As Andrew pointer out though, there doesn't seem to be a mechanism to cater for holes inside boundaries, so it's strictly a 1:1, Curve:Mesh relationship.
--
David Rutten
david@mcneel.com
Poprad, Slovakia
Thank you! That's perfect!
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by