Grasshopper

algorithmic modeling for Rhino

All,

I'm using Galapogos to form-find and test against acoustic parameters.

I don't have a strategy for widely variable massing, cubic to blobular, while perhaps maintaining a volume or floor area.

Because I'm using Galapogos, I want to minimize sliders and maximize the variation between iterations.

Any hints?

Views: 426

Replies to This Discussion

Formulate a strategy!

Yes!

Galapagos should work fine even with a relatively large number of sliders, but you should avoid discontinuities as much as possible. So a slider which, when moved, would start outputting blocks instead of blobs would not fair well.

It is extremely difficult to encode a large amount of variation with a small amount of sliders without introducing lots of discontinuities.

I have 24 sliders controlling X,Y,Z points of a box now. This is all being fed through a acoustic analysis (Pachyderm) and its working but slow, 22 Generations in a few hours.


What about cage editing of a box? I could set the sliders so that they don't impede on my floor space but deform the volume.


I'm at a university that doesn't have a user base so its tough sometimes! Thanks to all that make these tools so powerful!!!

One important thing I forgot to ask: 

Baking iterations from galapogos? My searches are turning up solutions from 2013 using "lunchbox" tools. Is there a more current method for baking iterations? 

RSS

About

Translate

Search

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Scott Davidson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service