algorithmic modeling for Rhino
BTW: If this simple surface is what you have in mind for that ... obsession of yours (he, he) THEN ... well ... we can forget the ultra complex system mailed some days ago and stick to the first one (the "rigid" X, that is - BTW: you did a very nice presentation of it: bravo).
These V1/V2 defs do that (minus the cables: task for the brave, he he). I mean that the X members are not rotating at all: therefor are co planar per pairs making life much much easier.
Certainly it's not the ideal tensegrity XTruss on a surface ... but who's gonna notice it? Nobody if you ask me (but I still recommend the double tetra: far simpler and more elegant).
Added a "solid" option (it's very slow) in order to start getting the gist of what clash issues mean: start playing with the divisions and observe the obvious.
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by