algorithmic modeling for Rhino
Hi. Joseph.
Of course you can skip unit mesh part coding and use referenced rhino geometry.
As you can see in my screen capture, there are no gaps between morphed meshes.
And if, in case there are too many divisions, using mesh is lighter..
I know "you can skip unit mesh part coding and use referenced rhino geometry" - I just did it in the post above. I was wondering about the reasons and difference? Thanks.
Hi Kim
Question: How do you join or weld all the individual geometries into a single piece of geometry. So I can perform a Catmull-Clark subdivision on the entire surface?
TIA!
I have no idea what a "Catmull-Clark subdivision" is... but using a brep for the 'Morph' input instead of a mesh allows a simple brep 'Join' to get the resulting polysurface. I extracted the vertices from the GH constructed mesh posted by Hyungsoo Kim, baked them, manually drew some curves from them in Rhino to create the "panel" using "Surface from network of curves":
Jospeh,
The Catmull–Clark algorithm is a technique used in computer graphic...
Kim is referring to the [wbCatmullClark] component in the Weaverbird library (see below).
Thanks. I didn't see anything about meshes in the OP so thought it was a distraction from the "Flow along surface" question, which is interesting by itself, without Weaverbird.
Hi Joesph
Sorry to interrupt: Meshman is one of the few programs that not only does exceptional subdivision, (FREE D/L) at http://www.holmes3d.net/graphics/meshman/
In addition:
If your Rhino created .OBJ file can't be opened in Meshman, Its because there is an opening in the mesh, which, means that the mesh can't be used, should you want to use it for 3d printing.
Welcome to
Grasshopper
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Parametric House 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Scott Davidson. Powered by